Skip to main content

Statement on the contribution for document WSIS-II/PC-3/DT/10 (Chapter Three: Internet Governance)

Submitted by the Association for Progressive Communications (APC)

On behalf of the Informal Coalition on Financing ICTD

Coalition Members:

AMARC

APC

Bread for All

CRIS

IT for Change

ITeM

The Informal Coalition on Financing ICTD wishes to contribute its thoughts

on Section 4 Measures to promote development of the Chair’s excellent

paper on Chapter 3 on Internet Governance. We focus our attention on

points 56 and 57 on making Internet access affordable.

Apart from being a logical infrastructure, the Internet consists as much

in the physical network that connects all people and enables them to use

it for achieving their full potential in promoting their sustainable

development and improving their quality of life (Geneva Declaration of

Principles). Effective universal access to the Internet and effective use

of the Internet for all people therefore comprises a core policy issue of

Internet Governance.

The Internet is a global public space that should be open and accessible

to all on a non-discriminatory basis. It is a global public infrastructure

and a global public good, whose value increases the more people and

organizations are added to it. This is the positive network externality

that the Internet has the potential to bring to human relations. And hence

universal Internet access is a key goal of the WSIS Plan of Action that

commits us all to connecting half the world’s inhabitants to ICTs by 2015.

According to ITU figures, 46% of the developed world’s inhabitants are

already connected to the Internet. Only 5% of the developing world’s

inhabitants have Internet access. So the WSIS goal requires us to find

ways of connecting 45% of the developing world to the Internet by 2015.

This translates into connecting approximately 2.2 billion people in the

developing world to the Internet in one decade.

This is obviously a mammoth task but one that we should not shrink from.

It requires us to find innovative ways to make Internet access affordable.

And this is why we propose that in addition to dealing with unequal

international interconnection costs and developing low cost equipment as

proposed in the Chair’s paper, the following steps should be included to

make the Internet truly ubiquitous:

a) Reducing international Internet costs

- by different policy options towards universal access. These may include

eliminating exploitative monopolistic practices for international backbone

provision, including through submarine cables;

- by supporting the establishment of national and international internet

exchange points;

- by building local demand for national, regional and international

backbone networks;

- by reducing costs charged by backbone providers;

b) Through public initiatives for backbone and Internet provision in areas

of market failure that, inter alia, leverage existing public

infrastructure like electricity and railways networks;

c) Eliminating exploitative monopolistic practices that affect the

provision of IP-based services, including VoIP;

d) Exploring an open network access approach to extending Internet access

in communities, particularly through the promotion of SME and community

networking;

e) Reconfiguring the mandate of national Universal Access Funds to support

Internet connectivity, applications and content development and capacity

building;

f) Exploring the development of local initiatives for content and

applications development as a way of reducing the cost of connecting to

the Internet;

g) Exploring the use of free and open source software, specially for the

provision of public services in areas such as education and health;

h) Promoting free-share or open content paradigm for socio-development

content on the Internet, and recognizing it as distinct from commercial

content that may require different IPR regimes.

i) Encouraging organisations to continue the study of the question of the

International Internet Connectivity (IIC) as an urgent matter to develop

appropriate Recommendations;

k) Developing low-cost equipment, especially for use in developing countries.

Author: —- (APCNews)

Contact: communications@apc.org

Source: APCNews

Date: 09/28/2005

Location: GENEVA, Switzerland

Category: Internet Governance